IN WHAT WAYS HAS THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AFFECTED THE ENVIRONMENT?
Introduction
Several environmental and climatic
repercussions have resulted from the worldwide disturbance produced by
COVID-19. Many cities' air quality has gotten better and water contamination
has decreased, as a result of restrictions on travel and a major slowing of
economic and social activity. In the following sections, there will be a
discussion related to the Online assignment help Los Angeles reduction of greenhouse gas and pollution, waste
management, ecosystem effects, energy consumption, international climate
change, and recommendation. In the end, there will be a conclusion based on
this essay.
Reduction of greenhouse gas and pollution
In 2019, fossil CO2 emissions (including
those from petroleum, natural gas, coal, plus cement) reached a record high of
36.64 GtCO2, before plummeting by an astonishing 1.98 GtCO2 (5.6%) in 2020 as a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Preliminary estimates suggest that master thesis help, within
the first five months of 2021, worldwide emission in the power, industrial, and
household sectors had already returned to the exact same level or been higher
than during the identical time frame of 2019. Vehicle-related pollution levels
have stayed roughly 6 percent lower.
The worldwide loss of ozone was
precipitated by a decline in NOx due to the COVID. A less-than-positive impact
of restricting NOx was discovered in the latest research by using satellite
data of a wide range of contaminants (Camargo-Caicedo et al. 2021). This pollutant interacts with water to
produce the hydroxyl radical, a fleeting molecule that is crucial in the
breakdown of long-lived gasses in the environment. While a decrease in NOx
emissions was helpful in addressing air pollution, the epidemic hampered the
process through which the environment naturally removed another significant
greenhouse gas: methane.
Despite widespread economic slowdown, by
the year 2020, emission levels had recovered to around the time of the pandemic
(Huang et al. 2021). The authors explain that with the
current global energy infrastructure, this increase in emissions was likely
essential for firms and people to retain any level of economic output.
It's heartening to see the number of
nations committed to net-zero emission objectives rise; now, these goals
account for around 63% of world emissions. To be realistic and credible,
nevertheless, these targets must be expressed in policy decisions made in the
near future and in NDCs that are far more aspirational for the years leading up
to 2030.
Plastic pollution and waste management shifts
Overall plastics manufacturing fell as
lockdowns and border controls disrupted supply systems. According to Plastics
Europe (2021), global plastics output fell by 0.3% in 2020 from 2019. The early
period of the pandemic had low oil prices, which may have increased
manufacturing, particularly of basic polymers, by lowering their cost. However,
the price for secondary (recycled) plastics is tied to that of primary,
therefore low oil prices suggest that growth of recycled plastics slowed in
2020.
Although there has been a trend toward
cloth masks during the COVID-19 epidemic, demand for plastic masks for the face
is much greater than it was before the pandemic (Al Qahtani et al. 2022). There is a lack of reliable statistics
on the total amount of face masks manufactured and disposed over the world in
2020, beyond the local and anecdotal information mentioned above.
In 2020, research proposal writing chicago the need for packaging was affected in several ways by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the rise of takeout, delivery, and online shopping has led to a greater need for plastic containers. The need for plastic containers to store hygienic goods like disinfecting gel also rose (Yusoff et al. 2021). In contrast, demand for packaging fell as a result of the shutdown of businesses and other restrictions on economic activity.
Effects on ecosystem and wildlife
Because of the decline in pollution and
the resulting emptiness of public areas, urban wildlife has been able to
explore new areas of the city. Animals are being observed entering cities all
over the globe as a result of people staying inside their houses to prevent the
spread of the deadly Coronavirus. While the world waits, we may reevaluate how
we interact with the natural world (Zhang et al. 2020). If we care about the future of urban
environment, we must master the art of living together. The effects of quarantine on animals have been
surprising. Monkeys and many other types of animals in places like India have
adapted very well to city life, and they rely significantly on human food
scraps. Further complicating matters is the practice of feeding monkeys for
religious reasons, which teaches them to equate humans with food. However,
there are advantages and disadvantages to this position. The elephants' future
is unclear, despite the fact that they are temporarily free from the
constraints of illegal wildlife tourism (Wilkinson et al. 2023). The elephants' chances of making it
are diminished because of the owners' inconsistent revenue and the scarcity of
available food and veterinary treatment.
Energy consumption pattern change
Home usage of energy rose as more
individuals were required to work from home or take care of young children,
resulting in greater time invested in the home.
Energy usage in industrial and commercial
structures has decreased significantly as a consequence of company closures and
a decline in industrial operations (Gholami et al. 2021).
The use of fuel and demand for
electricity in transportation have dropped significantly as a result of travel
limitations and changes in commute habits.
As a result of the epidemic, there have
been shifts in the growth and integration of renewable energy sources, which
has reduced the efficiency with which solar and wind power systems operate.
Evidence of the interdependence of social
behaviour, economic activity, and renewable energy sources was shown by the
COVID-19 pandemic's impact on electrical power practices. Long-term adjustments
toward sustainable energy practices were highlighted, as was the necessity for
flexible and robust energy systems.
Pandemic and international climate agreements
- The historic 2015 Paris Agreement aims to
address the effects of climate change and limit global temperature
increase. It targets emissions of greenhouse gases and encourages
worldwide climate action. This agreement has been tested and altered by
the pandemic (DeConto
et al.,2021). The pandemic's economic collapse and industrial
slowdown temporarily lowered emissions. The epidemic also slowed climate
ambitions. The postponement of COP26 until 2021 slowed discussions and
hampered international climate action. The epidemic has shown that global
climate change efforts must be guided by the Paris Agreement.
- The UNFCCC underpins worldwide climate change
collaboration. It seeks greenhouse gas stabilization and sustainable
development. The epidemic has affected UNFCCC processes, particularly COP
meetings. The pandemic postponed 2020's COP26. This delay hampered climate
funding, adaption, and mitigation talks. However, the epidemic has allowed
recovery efforts to evaluate and include climate goals (McKenzie, 2021). Many nations realize the need to
integrate economic recovery packages with climate ambitions to rebuild
better and greener. The UNFCCC continued to promote climate action and
international collaboration despite the epidemic.
Recommendations
●
Educate and inform the public more effectively on the
connections between the preservation of the environment, wellness for humans,
and the avoidance of potential pandemics.
●
To guarantee long-term viability and preparation for
future emergencies, post-pandemic recovery initiatives should include climate
change concerns and resiliency planning.
●
Encourage nations to work together to combat the effects
of climate change and other environmental threats via measures including
expanding access to climate-related finance and sharing technological know-how
(Yan et al. 2021).
●
Collaborations, public-private partnerships, and
grass-roots activities should be encouraged to increase community involvement
in sustainable development programs.
●
Recognizing the critical role, they play in avoiding
zoonotic illnesses and boosting resilience, people must put first nature
preservation and rehabilitation activities to safeguard ecosystems as well as
biodiversity.
●
Improve sustainable results by continuously monitoring and
assessing the environmental implications of pandemic response efforts.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that there are some
positive effects for some wildlife animals but negative effects on human life.
By 2020, emission levels had rebounded to roughly where they had been around
the time of the epidemic, despite the global economic recession. The authors
state that given the present global energy infrastructure, the rise in
emissions was probably necessary for businesses and individuals to maintain any
level of economic activity. The effects of the COVID-19 epidemic on electrical
power practices demonstrated the interconnectedness of social behavior,
economic activity, and renewable energy sources. Changes toward more
sustainable energy practices over the long run were stressed, as was the need
for systems that could adapt to changing conditions.
Comments
Post a Comment